Maria Isabel Bonta

It is really complex, from my position as a student and my vague memory, or today demonstrate the existence of evaluations on effects not observable or implicit in that course, as well as the inclusion of the ethical dimension. Have not strongly present, at least in my memory, the development of these last few concepts during the course, so you think that they have not existed as a such. TECHNIQUES and instruments based on the classification proposed by Maria Isabel Bonta, in his text techniques and instruments of evaluation, is detected the application of structured and unstructured diagnostic, process and product, oral and written, of self-evaluation and others, individual and group techniques. Likewise, perceive some of the advantages and disadvantages of each one of the techniques: the economy in times of examinations written in contrast with its low validity and reliability, the excellent individual diagnosis versus the comparative difficulty among pupils of the oral exam, the ease of fix to the detriment of the process evaluation that evidence assessments of type true or false, the real professional dimension in the use of the case method and solving problems versus the impossibility of quantifying the effort of each Member of the group. On the other hand, has not had the course of reference with formalisations of the evaluation of processes or interviews like methods evaluatorios. You have not used either in full form the concept of portfolio, put forward by Hilda Quintana, although Yes it has been close in its dimension of reflection, but not in folder format, where students think critically about their own learning process, their progress, achievements and difficulties. Original author and source of the article.

Comments are closed.

  • « Older Entries
  • Newer Entries »